I am here to help clarifying a confusion in the world science community.
The scientists were baffled with the measurement result of supernovae type 1A. They postulate that there is a dark energy accelerating the expansion of the universe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
I disagree with their conclusion and postulation. The flaw in their assumption is the gravitational constant has been remaining constant through time. Thus, Type 1A supernovae always went nova at the same mass, hence, would yield out the same Luminance.
According to my own model, the universe were much denser in the pass. Hence the gravitational constant would be higher. The type 1A supernovae would have smaller mass when it went novae in the pass. Thus they yield less light, and caused the scientist to wrongly conclude that they were much further away.
1 comment:
I am here to help clarifying a confusion in the world science community.
The scientists were baffled with the measurement result of supernovae type 1A. They postulate that there is a dark energy accelerating the expansion of the universe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
I disagree with their conclusion and postulation. The flaw in their assumption is the gravitational constant has been remaining constant through time. Thus, Type 1A supernovae always went nova at the same mass, hence, would yield out the same Luminance.
According to my own model, the universe were much denser in the pass. Hence the gravitational constant would be higher. The type 1A supernovae would have smaller mass when it went novae in the pass. Thus they yield less light, and caused the scientist to wrongly conclude that they were much further away.
QuantumZen997
Post a Comment